Types of network operating system
Maybe, this obstinacy in shielding the affiliated structure of hypertext was expected, to a limited extent, to the correlation of another medium, for example, hypertext, with that of customary simple media and, in this way, while a book could just tail one structure. direct through a transient and consecutive turn of events, it must be accentuated that hypertext could move away from the linearity forced by old backings, for example, paper or movie, since hypertext allows acquainted developments, notwithstanding simply desultory and straight. At the point when we needed to shine a book, we needed to do it in the edges of the paper or in references, since it was difficult to present deviations or remarks without breaking the string of the principle discourse.
semantic or acquainted system
Acquainted or semantic system
In any case, as we have confirmed, the hypertextual structure doesn't just comply with these affiliated or semantic connections, which are the most appropriate to a portrayal as a system, however in a hypertext, numerous different sorts of connections can be - and typically are - set up. pretty much organized and that comply with various leveled and successive connections.
The hypertextual structure is a very intricate structure that can incorporate in itself distinctive various kinds of association of data. A hypertext can not just present a structure as a system by methods for hubs binded to one another through cooperative or semantic relations, yet together with this affiliated reticular structure, it can introduce - and normally present as a genuine basic, formal system navigational and desultory - a successive or multisequential organization(that is, straight with choices) and/or a various leveled structure. A hypertextual structure can join every one of these structures to a more prominent or lesser degree, and organize one over the other, so it is erroneous to insist that the structure of a hypertext is restricted to the arrangement of a semantic or cooperative system.
How about we see different instances of hypertextual association not quite the same as the semantic or cooperative system structure:
various leveled hypertext1hierarchical hypertext2
Various leveled chains of command
Lluis Codina in The advanced book and the www condenses plainly the hypertext structure as a system or work with a 3-dimensional structure: "the rundown has just one measurement, which is the one that goes from left to right (or from option to left) The table has two: the lines (from left to right) and the sections (through and through) The hypertext has 3 measurements: the principal measurement is the up/down relationship or vertical relationship that shapes the essential structure of the hypertext. The second is the even relationship, which serves to join components of the hypertext by affiliation. The third, at last, is the one that sets up a connection between various hypertexts inside a narrative or narrative universe ".
Thus, it summarizes the 3 kinds of hypertext structures this way:
Tree structure: organizing of the different parts of the hyperdocument. Vertical route.
Semantic structure: foundation of possibly heuristic connections between the different pieces of the record. Flat route.
Straight structure with choices: Structuring of hubs or areas with prevalently logical or contentious substance
Maybe, this obstinacy in shielding the affiliated structure of hypertext was expected, to a limited extent, to the correlation of another medium, for example, hypertext, with that of customary simple media and, in this way, while a book could just tail one structure. direct through a transient and consecutive turn of events, it must be accentuated that hypertext could move away from the linearity forced by old backings, for example, paper or movie, since hypertext allows acquainted developments, notwithstanding simply desultory and straight. At the point when we needed to shine a book, we needed to do it in the edges of the paper or in references, since it was difficult to present deviations or remarks without breaking the string of the principle discourse.
semantic or acquainted system
Acquainted or semantic system
In any case, as we have confirmed, the hypertextual structure doesn't just comply with these affiliated or semantic connections, which are the most appropriate to a portrayal as a system, however in a hypertext, numerous different sorts of connections can be - and typically are - set up. pretty much organized and that comply with various leveled and successive connections.
The hypertextual structure is a very intricate structure that can incorporate in itself distinctive various kinds of association of data. A hypertext can not just present a structure as a system by methods for hubs binded to one another through cooperative or semantic relations, yet together with this affiliated reticular structure, it can introduce - and normally present as a genuine basic, formal system navigational and desultory - a successive or multisequential organization(that is, straight with choices) and/or a various leveled structure. A hypertextual structure can join every one of these structures to a more prominent or lesser degree, and organize one over the other, so it is erroneous to insist that the structure of a hypertext is restricted to the arrangement of a semantic or cooperative system.
How about we see different instances of hypertextual association not quite the same as the semantic or cooperative system structure:
various leveled hypertext1hierarchical hypertext2
Various leveled chains of command
Lluis Codina in The advanced book and the www condenses plainly the hypertext structure as a system or work with a 3-dimensional structure: "the rundown has just one measurement, which is the one that goes from left to right (or from option to left) The table has two: the lines (from left to right) and the sections (through and through) The hypertext has 3 measurements: the principal measurement is the up/down relationship or vertical relationship that shapes the essential structure of the hypertext. The second is the even relationship, which serves to join components of the hypertext by affiliation. The third, at last, is the one that sets up a connection between various hypertexts inside a narrative or narrative universe ".
Thus, it summarizes the 3 kinds of hypertext structures this way:
Tree structure: organizing of the different parts of the hyperdocument. Vertical route.
Semantic structure: foundation of possibly heuristic connections between the different pieces of the record. Flat route.
Straight structure with choices: Structuring of hubs or areas with prevalently logical or contentious substance
No comments:
Post a Comment